Jeffrey Reiff
Forty-six years at the Pennsylvania bar — the longest on this page, by five days over Donald Soloff. His firm's rideshare page is the most detailed here on where the $1 million actually comes from — and the most visibly unmaintained.
The bar record
We read Jeffrey Reiff in the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s attorney search. Every row below is the Board’s — this register carries no self-reported practice block at all.
Eleven registers, and this is the first that does not ask the question. Texas prints “No Public Disciplinary History”. Florida gives ten years. Washington shows a blank and warns its search may miss things. New York answers and then sends you to the Appellate Division. California prints a docket and links the court file. Massachusetts says “None” or “Yes” and links the decision. Pennsylvania’s attorney detail has no disciplinary field on it at all. So this listing carries a dash — the third distinct reason for a dash on this site, and the only one that is about the shape of the form rather than the content of the answer. The Board publishes discipline elsewhere; we have not searched those resources, and until we do, no green tick belongs here.
What it does publish is unique in the other direction. Where Washington and Massachusetts record professional liability insurance as a yes-or-no, Pennsylvania prints a sentence in the lawyer’s own voice, with a figure and a rule citation: “I maintain… at least $100,000 per occurrence and $300,000 in the aggregate… as set forth in Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4(c).” It is still a self-report. But of eleven registers, this is the only one that quotes the lawyer speaking rather than summarising them into a checkbox. It also gives a county and a disciplinary district, administrative geography no other register on this site publishes.
What the record shows
The page grounds the $1 million policy in an agreement with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission rather than the 2016 statute every other page in this batch cites. It is the only page here to name that basis, and we have not established which framing is right — only that eleven firms writing about one state give more than one account of where the money comes from.Verified
It then says that policy applies only when the driver is logged into the Uber application and is carrying an Uber passenger. Every other page in this batch also includes the en-route leg, from acceptance to pickup. On this page a reader hurt before the passenger got in would conclude the $1 million does not reach them.Verified
The page shows its age and its editing. It cites Section 5 of Uber’s Terms and Conditions, which was last updated April 2015; it contains the typo Uber shat not be liable; it repeats its own opening paragraphs near the foot; and his biography ends a list of former partnerships with and Reiff, Morrissey, Pressman, and . — a name simply missing.Verified
His bar record gives (215) 246-9000; the page gives (215) 709-6940. He is one of eleven of these fifteen whose published number is not the one on the register.Verified
What the firm says
He says he has practised for over forty years, served with the Philadelphia Public Defender’s and District Attorney’s Offices, and was admitted to the US Supreme Court in 1994 and the Supreme Court of New York in 2008. The Board’s record has no field for admissions elsewhere.Reported
He says he is a Judge Pro Tempore in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and Vice-Chair of the American Association for Justice Products Liability Section.Reported
He publishes a long list of recognitions including a Litigator’s Award said to go to the top 1% of attorneys and membership of an organisation reserved for the top 1%. We print no rankings as fact and no recovery figures.Reported
Rideshare
What we haven’t checked
No attorney pays to be listed here, and this profile is not an endorsement or a recommendation. We report the public record so you can weigh it yourself. If anything here is inaccurate or out of date, tell us and we’ll correct it. How we work