Rideshare Accident Attorney
StatesPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaMichael-John Goodnow
MG

Michael-John Goodnow

Matkoff & Shengold · 1101 Market St, Philadelphia, PA
✓ Bar verified · Aug 2026Personal injury firm
41 yrs
Licensed in Pennsylvania
Admitted 30 Oct 1984
Active
Current status
Attorney ID 41656
Public discipline
No such field on the record
District 1
Disciplinary district
Philadelphia County — per the Board

One of only two lawyers here whose published phone number matches the one on his bar record. His firm's rideshare page, by contrast, begins a list of who the $1 million covers and stops after a single line.

The bar record

We read Michael-John Goodnow in the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s attorney search. Every row below is the Board’s — this register carries no self-reported practice block at all.

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Record read 18 August 2026
Attorney ID
Board record
41656
Current status
Active
Date of admission
30 October 1984
Employer
Matkoff Shengold et al
Address
1101 Market St Ste 2500, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-2926
Telephone
(215) 922-6073 — matches the number the firm publishes
Fax
(215) 922-5787
County · District
Board record
Philadelphia · District 1
Professional liability insurance
Board record
“I maintain, either individually or through my firm, professional liability insurance of at least $100,000 per occurrence and $300,000 in the aggregate per year as set forth in Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4(c).” — the Board prints this in the lawyer’s own voice
Public discipline
No such field appears on the record. Not “none”, not blank — the question is not asked here

Eleven registers, and this is the first that does not ask the question. Texas prints “No Public Disciplinary History”. Florida gives ten years. Washington shows a blank and warns its search may miss things. New York answers and then sends you to the Appellate Division. California prints a docket and links the court file. Massachusetts says “None” or “Yes” and links the decision. Pennsylvania’s attorney detail has no disciplinary field on it at all. So this listing carries a dash — the third distinct reason for a dash on this site, and the only one that is about the shape of the form rather than the content of the answer. The Board publishes discipline elsewhere; we have not searched those resources, and until we do, no green tick belongs here.

What it does publish is unique in the other direction. Where Washington and Massachusetts record professional liability insurance as a yes-or-no, Pennsylvania prints a sentence in the lawyer’s own voice, with a figure and a rule citation: “I maintain… at least $100,000 per occurrence and $300,000 in the aggregate… as set forth in Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4(c).” It is still a self-report. But of eleven registers, this is the only one that quotes the lawyer speaking rather than summarising them into a checkbox. It also gives a county and a disciplinary district, administrative geography no other register on this site publishes.

What the record shows

The page reads Uber and Lyft’s insurance liability coverage applies to victims who were: and then gives one bullet — Passengers at the time of their injuries; — followed by a second that is not a category of victim at all, and then nothing. The list of who is covered is one item long and ends with a semicolon. No tiers, no figures, no statute, no deadline.Verified

Read literally, it tells drivers of other cars, pedestrians and cyclists that the rideshare policy is not for them. Every other page in this batch says otherwise. We do not think that is what the firm means; we think nobody finished the sentence.Verified

His register phone and his firm’s published phone are the same number — (215) 922-6073. Only he and Farhan Ali can say that among these fifteen.Verified

His record shows the firm as Matkoff Shengold et al; the site trades from msbglaw.com, four initials for a two-name firm. The Board’s record carries no website field to reconcile them.Verified

What the firm says

He says he has been with Matkoff & Shengold since 2000, has argued in the state and federal appellate courts, and has tried many cases to jury verdicts across the Commonwealth.Reported

He says he is admitted before the United States Supreme Court, the Third Circuit and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Board’s record has no field for any of them.Reported

He says he regularly sits as an arbitrator in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and in the Eastern District.Reported

Rideshare

Rideshare content — checked 18 Aug 2026
Uber & Lyft
msbglaw.com — a rideshare page whose coverage list stops mid-thought after one bullet; returns 200 from our network
This is the firm’s own marketing. It shows they hold themselves out as taking rideshare cases — it is not evidence that they have run one, and we have not verified any rideshare case they have handled.

What we haven’t checked

Not established. His federal and Supreme Court admissions, for which the Board’s record has no field. What the firm’s unfinished coverage list was meant to say. The Board’s separate disciplinary resources, which we have not searched for anyone on this page — the largest gap across all fifteen Philadelphia listings. What any of them actually practises, since the register does not ask. We have not reviewed court records for case outcomes, we print no settlement or verdict figures, and we have no basis for judging quality of representation. A bar check is a floor, not a ranking.
Matkoff & Shengold1101 Market St Ste 2500, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-2926

No attorney pays to be listed here, and this profile is not an endorsement or a recommendation. We report the public record so you can weigh it yourself. If anything here is inaccurate or out of date, tell us and we’ll correct it. How we work